Advocates argue that it aids student outcomes such as test scores, graduation rates, and solutions to behavioral difficulties. In 19th century Western Europe, the most common way for girls to access education was at home, through private tutoringand not at school, due to the strong resistance to women's involvement in schools.
Since there is no meaningful difference in the educational outcomes, self-esteem development, or overall performance with coeducation compared to a single-gender classroom, the cost of creating this structure could be viewed as a waste of money. Two students from the same class, when given the same test, can achieve very different scores because academic achievement is determined by more than just curriculum.
Advocates of single-sex education believe that there are persistent gender differences in how boys and girls learn and behave in educational settings, and that such differences merit educating them separately.
New York Times. Related: What is a Charter School? The American public-school system is always a hot topic for debate. This research discovered that when the elements of an excellent education are present, such as a small classroom size, a smaller school, and equitable teaching practices, then both genders saw more success than those who learned in gender-specific ways.
Category Government Regulation.
They can design the curriculum in a way that students connect with it. Pros and Cons of Single-Sex Education.
Professors David and Myra Sadker from American University published research in that discovered striking levels of unfairness toward each gender in the public school system. Advocates of single-sex education believe that there are persistent gender differences in how boys and girls learn and behave in educational settings, and that such differences merit educating them separately.
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. As such, mass elementary education was introduced, and more and more coeducational schools were set up.