Chicago Cohen v. Pico Bethel School District v. Des Moines Ind. The court struck down all laws across the country banning interracial marriage — as it should now do with laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. Florida Bar Thompson v. He further identified that while the state's law is to assure that same-sex couples had access to the same services as heterosexual couples, the law goes too far in its enforcement, since Craig and Mullins were easily able to obtain a wedding cake from a different vendor in the state.
Fitzgerald Felder v. Opponents of equality frequently make use of flawed research studies to insinuate that allowing same-sex couples to marry will somehow harm anti same sex marriage arguments against in Denver. Finding that "laws of the kind now before us raise the inevitable inference that the disadvantage imposed is born of animosity toward the class of persons affected," the Court inferred that the passage of Amendment 2 was born of a "bare Project Vote Smart.
Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. In fact, this is one of the best benefits of same sex marriage. Boren Milliken v. The Christian Science Monitor.
Join HuffPost. Vuitch Doe v. In the US the conception of marriage as a transaction between father-in-law and son-in-law meant a woman went from being economically dependent on her father to the same status vis-a-vis her husband. Same-sex marriage legalization is correlated with a lower divorce rate, whereas same-sex marriage bans are correlated with higher divorce rates.
Stanglin Texas v. Glen Theatre City of Erie v. Chicago Cohen v. North Carolina In the public forum Davis v. A Supreme Court review would put all that litigation on hold.